'

AMD's Ryzen CPUs use 10% less die area than their Intel equivalents

AMD's Ryzen CPUs use 10% less die area than their Intel equivalents

AMD's Ryzen CPUs use 10% less die area than their Intel equivalents

AMD's Ryzen CPUs use 10% less die area than their Intel equivalents

 
AMD's Ryzen CPUs use 10% less die area than their Intel equivalents, potentially allowing AMD to produce their Ryzen CPUs more cheaply than Intel. 
 
This news clearly shows that AMD has a highly competitive CPU design that can fit into a very small area, despite using Globafoundries' technically inferior 14nm FinFET process. On thing to note is that Intel's Kaby Lake CPUs are using a refined version of Intel's 14nm process and their Skylake CPU design. At this time it is unknown how factors other than die-size will affect AMD's Ryzen CPUs and their production costs, as this is where yields and Glofabfoundries' profit margins will come into play.  
 
Looking at these basic core specifications AMD's Ryzen chip could be seen as slightly superior, with 512KB of L2 cache rather than the 256KB per core that Kaby Lake features. That being said there is a lot more to CPU performance than cache sizes and core counts, making it impossible to tell how well AMD's Ryzen CPUs will perform compared to Kaby Lake.   
 

  

AMD's Ryzen CPUs use 10% less die area than their Intel equivalents  

 

It is clear from this data that AMD's Ryzen CPUs are very well designed and make very good use of die space, though it remains to be seen how all this will affect the CPU's competitiveness in the market.  

In EE Times' recent article on this topic, it was stated that "Analysts and even Intel engineers in the session said the Zen core is clearly competitive", which is a highly impressive feat for AMD. Let's hope that AMD's Ryzen CPUs will continue to impress when they hit the market next month. 

 

You can join the discussion on AMD's Ryzen CPUs on the OC3D Forums

 

«Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments

07-02-2017, 10:06:39

RobM
Ooo now that is interesting, even more pressure on Intel Quote

07-02-2017, 10:11:36

g0ggles1994
Wow, wouldn't have expected a smaller die than Intel. I just want to see actual release date now. The hype train is like from Back to the Future and the red log is about to blow.Quote

07-02-2017, 10:33:07

spies_sparks
Gotta love those rumours!

I still doubt AMD will actually be able to become the competition, it once was...Quote

07-02-2017, 10:36:32

Surpuppa
Why does the dye size matter?Quote

07-02-2017, 11:14:59

AlienALX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surpuppa View Post
Why does the dye size matter?
Smaller it is cheaper to make plus more you can cram onto a CPU.

Wafers are round. They then cut squares from that round silicon wafer. The smaller the die the more you get per wafer and the higher the % of working dies vs dead ones.

TLDR it's cheaper so you can sell more for less.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.