China has launched a WTO dispute against the US as other countries consider semiconductor restrictions

Japan and the Netherlands are due to join the US by restricting sales to China

China has launched a WTO dispute against the US as other countries consider semiconductor restrictions

China files WTO dispute to curb the US' semiconductor sanctions

A semiconductor war is brewing between the US and China, with the former introducing sanctions that would control semiconductor exports to the growing superpower. The US' new export regulations, which came into force in October, are designed to slow the growth of China's semiconductor industry by denying the country access to western chipmaking tools. Now, Japan and the Netherlands (the home nation of ASML) are reportedly ready to join the US by tightening their own export controls (as reported by Bloomberg). 

By denying China access to the world's most advanced chipmaking tools, the US and its allies hopes to limit China's ability to utilise semiconductor technologies for military applications and to prevent China's semiconductor industry from growing. For the US, these sanctions against China will help to maintain the leadership position that the US and their allies have on the global semiconductor market, and in the long term it will force China to create their own home-grown semiconductor manufacturing tools.

China's response

China has launched a trade dispute at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) against the US over its export controls, stating that the US' export controls "threatened the stability of the global industrial supply chains". 

The Chinese commerce ministry released the following statement regarding their actions at the World Trade Organisation. 

  China takes legal actions within the WTO framework as a necessary way to address our concerns and to defend our legitimate interests,

China has launched a WTO dispute against the US as other countries consider semiconductor restrictions

What the US says

In response to China's complaints at the World Trade Organisation, Adam Hodge, a spokesperson for the US Trade Representative's office had this to say to Reuters.   

   We have received a request for consultations from the (People's Republic of China) related to certain U.S. actions affecting semiconductors,

As we have already communicated to the PRC, these targeted actions relate to national security, and the WTO is not the appropriate forum to discuss issues related to national security,

You can join the discussion on China's WTO complaint against the US on the OC3D Forums

«Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments

13-12-2022, 21:26:30

demonking
National security reasons

the cop out for anything

in reality while there may be some concerns for national security, i very much doubt that there is a single bit of technology that could come from china that any other super economy could not prevent from transmitting data to anywhere they didn't want it to.

What congress is worried about is that their wallets might get a bit lighter if a cheaper chinese product came along and took the only thing other than weapons the US has of making money, technology.

Tiktok has already encapsulated the next generation, Huawei was eating away at Apples market share when they got banned and if China decides to Annex Taiwan, the US have no way to recover their technology sector until its new fabs are set up.

Make no mistake, this is about money with the cover of "national security"Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.