• Home
• Content
  • All
  • Audio
  • Cases & Cooling
  • CPU & Mainboard
  • GPU & Displays
  • Input Devices
  • Memory
  • PSUs
  • Storage
  • Software
  • Systems
  • Misc.
• Tech Search
• OC3D.tv
• Community

AMD Phenom II X6 1075T

SiSoft Sandra & Everest

Published: 21st September 2010 | Source: AMD | Price: £186 | Author: Milind Chidrawar

CPU Performance

SiSoftware Sandra (the System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is an information & diagnostic utility capable of benchmarking the performance of individual components inside a PC.

CPU Arithmetic

The CPU arithmetic test ascertains the processor's capabilities in terms of numerical operations. Two subtests named Dhrystone and Whetstone are carried out respectively. This is not a measure of latency and thus higher is better.

Stock for stock, the 1090T kicks off with a marginal lead, while of course the overclocked 1075T turns the tables, leaving the range topping unit for dead.

CPU Multimedia

The CPU Multimedia Test focuses on CPU based operations that may occur during multimedia based tasks. The magnitude of the score depends on the processor's ability to handle Integer, Float and Double data types

Nothing too dissimilar here as we conclude our tests with SiSoft Sandra. Do you see £30's worth of performance gains between the two processors? Hold onto your opinions for now.

CPU Queen

CPU Queen is based on branch prediction and the misprediction penalties that are involved.

Some very competitive scores being generated here. Once again, the 1075T clings onto the 1090T with little trouble.

CPU Photoworxx

PhotoWorxx as the name may suggest tests processors by means of invoking functions that are common to Photo Manipulation including Fill, Flip, Crop, Rotate, Difference and Colour to B&W conversion.

The Photoworxx test offers a similar outcome.

CPU ZLib

This is an integer based benchmark that will test the CPU and Memory by means of the CPU ZLib compression library.

Zlib's operations in particular appear to really leverage the additional power that the overclocked 1075T offers, pushing well ahead of both stock processors.

Most Recent Comments

21-09-2010, 07:38:28

Diablo

Great review as always guys. What cooler did you use for this, and what were the temperatures like?Quote

21-09-2010, 08:15:35

tinytomlogan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diablo Great review as always guys. What cooler did you use for this, and what were the temperatures like?

I was talking to Mul about this the other night, was the classic is it really that cool? AMD style chip. Load was mid 40's on a SilenX cooler youll be seeing reviewed soon.Quote

21-09-2010, 11:27:08

silenthill

Same old Phenom, it has to be overclocked to its max so it can compete with default core i7’s when are AMD going to come up with something that has a triple channel controller and can give you the huge memory bandwidth that the core i7’s have otherwise AMD are just wasting their time and will remain the underdog of the cpu market.

Quote

21-09-2010, 12:50:10

Diablo

They remain relatively competative in a more budget concious world. For example a consumer wanting decent bandwidth for their PCIe interfaces, and a reasonable performance is probably going to go for a 1055/1075T, a CHIV, for about £320-340. A decent i7 board is going to run £200+, plus an i7 950 which is £220 ish.

I agree that they desperately need to update the K10 architecture (I'm pretty sure Helen of Troy had one). But for massively multithreaded programs, the AMD is still a smart buy.Quote

21-09-2010, 19:06:59

Seraphim401

WTF!This is not a BE cpu!Quote

Reply

Related Content