AMD Raven Ridge Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G Review
3DMARK Fire Strike
Published: 16th February 2018 | Source: AMD | Price: |
3DMARK Fire Strike
In our 3DMARK Fire Strike tests, we have decided to include more detailed breakdowns than usual, looking at the tool's final results as well as individual looks at how memory speed affects both the CPU and GPU focused portions of the benchmark.
Just like 3DMARK Sky Diver, we can see that Fire Strike showcases increased graphics performance, with the Ryzen 3 2200G offering a 9% increase in Fire Strike (standard) graphics score when moving from 2400MHz memory to 3200MHz memory.
When making the same comparison on AMD's Ryzen 5 2400G we can see a more significant increase of 12.5%, which makes a lot of sense given the fact that this APU has a lot more GPU cores to feed.
On the CPU side, we can see that Fire Strike is not affected by changed to memory speed, with the normal run-to-run variance being present. This result is unlike newer 3DMARK tests like Sky Diver and Time Spy, which seem to be a lot more susceptible to changes in memory performance.
Most Recent Comments
HDMI 2.0? I got a HDMI only 4K TV. The 2200G will be the cheapest solution by far, that supports hdmi 2.0. The only native alternative is 1030/rx550, which is almost alone the cost of the 2200G.Quote
|
Originally Posted by RobM
no video Tom?
|
|
Originally Posted by Frode B Nilsen
What is the test bench setup?
HDMI 2.0? I got a HDMI only 4K TV. The 2200G will be the cheapest solution by far, that supports hdmi 2.0. The only native alternative is 1030/rx550, which is almost alone the cost of the 2200G. |
HDMI 2.0 will be down to what your motherboard supports, as some AM4 motherboards only have HDMI 1.4 as far as I am aware.Quote
|
Originally Posted by WYP
The Video is now in the review.
Test bench setup is on page 2 at the bottom. HDMI 2.0 will be down to what your motherboard supports, as some AM4 motherboards only have HDMI 1.4 as far as I am aware. |
"AMD Ryzen 3 2200G & Ryzen 5 2400G
ASUS Prime Z370-PLUS
G.Skill Flare X 3200MHz memory
Corsair RM1000i
Corsair MP500 512GB
Corsair H110i GT
Windows 10"
That probably should be x370-PLUS, Z370-PLUS? Anyway, i missed it down there, so thanks for answering.
As for what motherboards supports, the specs are a mess:
X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM
"-1 x HDMI 2.0 port, supports a maximum resolution of [email protected] (1)
-1 x DisplayPort, supports a maximum resolution of [email protected] (2)
(1) Only support when using a 7th Gen A-series/ Athlon processors
(2) Maximum shared memory of 2048 MB"
What does that mean?
GA-AX370-Gaming K7
" Integrated Graphics Processor:
1. 1 x HDMI port, supporting a maximum resolution of [email protected] Hz
* Support for HDMI 1.4 version.
2. Maximum shared memory of 2 GB
* Actual support may vary by CPU."
These specs can actually mean a lot of different things. Like being written for the Athlon CPUs available at MB launch or like for the K7, that they maybe but not clearly only support HDMI 1.4. It is clearly CPU dependent, and Athlons only support HDMI 1.4, so what is the story with the MSI board? The HDMI on the MSI is after all only available using an last gen Athlon?
No body seems to know, but a lot of people are opinionated. I would really appreciate it, if you could try it out.
As for HDMI 1.4, max refresh rate for 2D is 24Hz.Quote
CSS Valid