AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
Gaming
Published: 7th November 2020 | Source: AMD | Price: £279.99 |
Gaming
Lastly our gaming benchmarks are the real world application of the results we’ve seen on the preceding two pages. Civilization VI is all about how long it takes to calculate a complex turn. Far Cry 5 is a good all-rounder. Shadow of the Tomb Raider stretches every facet of your setup. Total Warhammer II has a simple and complex battle scene and we’re testing both. We’re also showing the average FPS as well as the minimum FPS, with the minimum being good for indicating smoothness. Nobody likes a stutter after all.
Most Recent Comments
Great write up, looks like a strong little gaming chip, has anyone tried per core overclocking on this?Quote
4.7Ghz at only 1.2v is very nice. But that PBO overclock is also very tasty.
Has anyone seen how these new Ryzen CPUs perform in music production workloads? That was another weak point for past iterations of Zen.Quote
Has anyone seen how these new Ryzen CPUs perform in music production workloads? That was another weak point for past iterations of Zen.Quote
Seems AMD have all needs for pc covered with this round of cpu releases, really no reason to look at intels offerings.
P.s I always watch until the end of the video'sQuote
P.s I always watch until the end of the video'sQuote
From all the reviews I've seen over the past days, this particular CPU seems to be one hell of a CPU. First time I've actually ordered it straight away.
With this though and this might be a bit off topic, but I had one or two thoughts of Aliens logics behind this decision this time around, so thank you for your past inputs Alien!Quote
With this though and this might be a bit off topic, but I had one or two thoughts of Aliens logics behind this decision this time around, so thank you for your past inputs Alien!Quote
The DaVinci Resolve benchmarks looks really weird. The 5900X performs the same as the 3600XT at stock, but higher than the 3950X with PBO? The 10900K performs worse than everything but the 3400G? Makes no sense.Quote
CSS Valid