ASUS TUF X470-Plus Review
3D Mark
Published: 11th July 2018 | Source: ASUS | Price: |
3D Mark
3D Mark is sufficiently GPU bound that we're merely discovering if the TUF has any holes in its armoury rather than expecting to see significant differences between the various X470 models, and sure enough all is well.
Most Recent Comments
... It always annoys me when motherboards ship without full voltage control. I don't like using voltage offsets, they differ far too much from board to board and don't offer the kind of control that I would expect when overclocking. I would have expected more from an X470 motherboard.Quote
Damn, Asus appears to be slipping. I'm still not happy with my CH6 Hero, and this looks even worse. Eeek!Quote
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bartacus
Damn, Asus appears to be slipping. I'm still not happy with my CH6 Hero, and this looks even worse. Eeek!
|
why not? i have two of them and they run flawless 24/7.Quote
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gothmoth
why not? i have two of them and they run flawless 24/7.
|
I get so tired of reading reviews where they want to compare hardware to the flagship hardware when most folk are not going to notice a difference between any of these MB's with the same hardware build, and Clearly the only ones slipping here is this reviewer not Asus. I personally have this MB in my current build with a liquid-cooled Ryzen 2600x and you can most certainly overclock this board in the bios... you can also save OC profiles etc. The reason I went with the ASUS TUF X470-PLUS GAMING is more for the "TUF" Over-built Protection. I live is an area that is hot and humid in the summer or cold and electrostatic-dry in the winter. Plus everyone knows that Precision Boost is the way to go with a Ryzen CPU anyway. And if you want to OC a Ryzen on-the-fly... just use Ryzen Master software.Quote
CSS Valid