ASUS X399-E Strix Gaming Review
Geekbench and Realbench
Published: 18th January 2018 | Source: ASUS | Price: |
Geekbench and Realbench
The multicore results save the Strix from ignominy but the single core results show the root cause of the performance issues we've been experiencing so far.
Most Recent Comments
I have to question Asus' motives these days. A gaming board for what is clearly meant as a workstation CPU (and small servers too I reckon), and this isn't the first of them. In fact they don't even make a workstation board for this CPU. I guess they expect only gamers to buy these CPU's, which seems strange to me.Quote
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tolagarf
I have to question Asus' motives these days. A gaming board for what is clearly meant as a workstation CPU (and small servers too I reckon), and this isn't the first of them. In fact they don't even make a workstation board for this CPU. I guess they expect only gamers to buy these CPU's, which seems strange to me.
|
I dont think they expect to sell many at all. Mainly because of TR rather than the board itself.Quote
To be honest the only thing that looks uber about that board is the cover on the IO. Then you remove it and realise there's a pittance in there. Not enough phases either.
I am finding it hard to differentiate it too much from the B350 Strix. I know it has lanes and slots etc but what good is all that if the performance stinks?
Ed. I'm sorry, HOW MUCH?!?!?!?!
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/asus...gbe-wifi-usb-3Quote
I am finding it hard to differentiate it too much from the B350 Strix. I know it has lanes and slots etc but what good is all that if the performance stinks?
Ed. I'm sorry, HOW MUCH?!?!?!?!
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/asus...gbe-wifi-usb-3Quote
Which Bios where you using - current available as far as I can see is 0402? Any chance that you had a Spectre microcode update applied and or MS patch? Would account for a bit of performance drop.Quote
Nevermind, just realized it is AMD 
Quote
Quote
CSS Valid