Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Quad Core CPU


Penryn Wafer ... mmmmmm
Despite Intel currently having "one up" on AMD, they certainly haven't been resting on their laurels. Rather than just simply taking the QX6850, slapping an extra 4mb cache on top and calling it a new processor, Intel has given the chip a complete overhaul; replacing the aging polysilicon material used in most processors with their own "high-K" technology. This combined with moving to the 45nm manufacture process has left us with a processor that consumes less power than its predecessors and paves the path for greater bumps in performance in the future.
Coming from the "Extreme" lineup, the QX9650 is also an amazing overclocker.  Even on fairly budget air cooling, we were able to take the chip all the way up to 4275mhz by utilizing a 9.5x multiplier along with a 450mhz FSB. This certainly wasn't the limit of the chip either, with heat being the only obstacle in our way. Users of water cooling or even more extreme methods of cooling should easily see 4.4ghz and beyond.
We could at this point talk about the eye watering £640 price tag that the chip carries. But let's face it: everybody knows that Intel's top-end chips carry a premium price tag and there really is no need to be looking at the QX9650 unless you absolutely must have the best, or you're an overclocker who needs that unlocked multi to squeeze every last MHZ out of the chip.
The Good
• Cooler and more energy efficient.
• An overclocking monster.
• New SSE4 instructions.
The Mediocre
• Software is still way behind unleashing the full potential of this chip.
The Bad
• The price...and the fact that I want one!
Overclock3D Performance Award
Planning on splashing out on this or any of Intel's latest 45nm chips? Let us know in the forums.
«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

10-04-2008, 20:20:40

woah, one hell of a review!

its not even up on the front page yet

EDIT: good review

the dual core got left in the dust for multi-threaded aplications

but that processor isnt THAT much further ahead of the Q6600 tbh..

not really worth the extra ££ IMO

but as you said, the best of the best...Quote

10-04-2008, 20:25:47

Wow.. Where did this come from..

Will read it in a min


10-04-2008, 20:34:31

yummy! I want, but not enough money, ahhhggggg.Quote

10-04-2008, 20:43:45

Originally Posted by name='!TIMMY!'
yummy! I want, but not enough money, ahhhggggg.
Ditto...I was tempted to run off with it to Mexico Quote

10-04-2008, 21:45:48

Im hopefully getting a Q9450, im not going to even consider spending that much money one something not all that great, a Q9450 = cheap, good for le future useage, and meh, its my b'day in a few weeks so i might as well treat myself.

Anyone else looking at anything similar or sticking with whats already out?Quote

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.