Gear of War: Ultimate Edition Performance Retest - The Game has been Fixed!

Introduction

Gear of War: Ultimate Edition Performance Retest - The Game has been Fixed!

Introduction

When Gears of War: Ultimate Edition launched on the Windows store it was a total disaster, with terrible performance and graphical glitches on AMD GPUs, lacking support for FreeSync/G-Sync and coming with all of the disadvantages that are brought to the table with all Windows 10 Store exclusive titles.

Now the game has received game ready drivers from both AMD and Nvidia and has received a new performance PC patch which promises better performance Ultra Wide monitor support and adds an option to disable mouse smoothing.

In short this update premises to deliver the Gears of War experience that PC gamers should have had at launch, but does this new update give us that? Let's have a look.   

 

 

 

Drivers 

For this game we will be using the newest drivers that were available when the game released, which is Nvidia's Game Ready Geforce 364.51 driver and AMD's 16.3 driver, both of which became available to the public recently.  

 

Test Setup  

We will be testing this game on our dedicated GPU test rig using the current flagship GPUs from both AMD and Nvidia. Both GPUs will be the reference design and will be ran at stock settings. 

 

AMD R9 Fury X & Nvidia GTX 980Ti
Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.7GHz
ASUS Maximus VIII Hero
G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR4 3200MHz
Corsair HX1200i
Corsair H110i GT
Windows 10 x64 

       Rise of the Tomb Raider - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review  Rise of the Tomb Raider - AMD VS Nvidia Performance Review

Nvidia GTX 980Ti (Left), AMD R9 Fury X (Right)

 

To represent AMD and Nvidia's Mid range GPU offerings we have decided to use the AMD R9 380 and the Nvidia GTX 960. Both of these GPUs will be the ASUS Strix models

Both of these GPUs offer very similar performance in most scenarios and come in at very similar pricepoints, so it will be very interesting to see which GPU will come out on top. 

 

          Metal Gear Solid 5 Performance Review with ASUS  Metal Gear Solid 5 Performance Review with ASUS

Nvidia GTX 960(Left), AMD R9 380(Right)

 

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next»

Most Recent Comments

16-03-2016, 09:59:04

XAZ1
why would you run test with vsync this test is pointlessQuote

16-03-2016, 09:59:57

Dylzan
Quote:
Originally Posted by XAZ1 View Post
why would you run test with vsync this test is pointless
All games on the Windows Store currently have forced VSync.Quote

16-03-2016, 10:00:03

WYP
Quote:
Originally Posted by XAZ1 View Post
why would you run test with vsync this test is pointless
It is not V-Sync. the game has a framerate cap at monitor refresh. Not V-SyncQuote

16-03-2016, 11:43:29

vidyan
Look at that R9 380, suddenly it went from "The way its mean to be gimped" to "better than 960"Quote

16-03-2016, 12:14:40

Hadex
Looks like OC3D is biased towards AMD. Nvidia was faster so game was broken, now AMD is faster or ties and suddenly game is fixed. Now look at Hitman review - "AMD is simply dominant". Suddenly nothing from with that. Tides have changed and AMD gimping every game.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.