Nvidia RTX 2060 Super and RTX 2070 Super Review

RTX 2070 Super Specifications

Nvidia RTX 2060 Super and RTX 2070 Super Review

RTX 2070 Super Specifications

Demonstrating that there is more than one way to skin a cat, the RTX 2070 Super takes a slightly different approach than the upgrades applied to the RTX 2060 Super. Both start off the same, with the RTX 2070 Super having four extra Shader Modules which give you another 256 CUDA Cores. However, whilst the RTX 2060 Super was 105 MHz faster at base clock and 30 MHz slower when utilising GPU Boost, the RTX 2070 is just faster, gaining 195 MHz base clock and 150 MHz when boosted.

This has a significant effect upon the calculative abilities of the card. The RTX 2060 Super was 0.7 TFLOPS faster than its predecessor but the RTX 2070 Super is a scarcely believable 1.6 TFLOPS faster than the already speedy RTX 2070. Similarly the Tensor Cores saw a 11% boost on the RTX 2060 between vanilla and Super, but the RTX 2070 Super gains 20%. Lastly the RTX 2060 Super gained 16 Texture Units over the regular model for a 11% increase in Giga Texels Per Second fill-rate, whilst the RTX 2070 Super gains 40 new TUs for a 39.6% increase in Texel fill-rate.

The only area that the RTX 2070 Super doesn't have a massive lead on its illustrious predecessor when compared to the improvements on the RTX 2060 Super is in Memory performance, but that's largely because the RTX 2070 was already well endowed.

 GeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2070 Super
SMs 3640
CUDA Cores 23042560
Base Clock 1410 MHz1605 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1620 MHz1770 MHz
FLOPS 7.5 TFLOPS (INT32/FP32)9.1 TFLOPS (INT32/FP32)
Tensor FLOPS 60 TFLOPS72 TFLOPS
Rays Cast 6 Giga Rays7 Giga Rays
Texture Units 144184
Texel Fill-Rate 233.3 GT/s 325.7 GT/s
Memory Interface 256-bit256-bit
Memory Data Rate 14 Gbps14 Gbps
Memory Bandwidth 448 GB/s448 GB/s
Memory Size 8 GB8 GB
Max L1 Cache Size 2304 KB2560 KB
TGP 175 W215 W

Let's look at them in the flesh.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next»

Most Recent Comments

03-07-2019, 09:56:25

Gothmoth
Quote:
that have set the market alight with their excellent combination of performance and price point
are you trolling us or did you say that with a straight face?

the performance increase (compared with other generational updates) was not good and the price was certainly not good.

you might want to watch what other youtubers and people who are not nvidia fanboys had to say about the initial RTX release.

i know OC3D was back then all hyped about RTX and these overpriced cards.
when others were way more critical.

but reality must set in at some point!?

not to mention that RTX is still a gimmick barely used in games.



the super cards are what should have been release in the first place (for the asked price).
i feel bad for the people who bought a 2060, 2070 or 2080 RTX card.

this update makes them look like guinea pigs.... or better say cows to be milked.


yes they had RTX for a few month now (and i am sure would not have missed it).


kudos to nvidia... their marketing department sure knows how handle the majority of gamers.





Quote:
their excellent combination of performance and price point
nah you sure must be trolling us.....Quote

03-07-2019, 10:17:08

grec
Despite the controversy in the usual overly angry circles, Turing cards performed well on market and past the RTX2060's release had a pretty warm reception amongst the mainstream. They've without a doubt had a significant impact on increasing the penetration of DXR amongst both developers and consumers with every modern game engine now in the process of implementing realtime-raytracing, all those who called raytracing a gimmick that would go the way of PhysX or whatever were flatly wrong(But those comparisons were way off the mark anyway).Quote

03-07-2019, 10:28:34

Gothmoth
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgrech View Post
Despite the controversy in the usual overly angry circles, Turing cards performed well on market and past the RTX2060's release had a pretty warm reception amongst the mainstream.

yeah kudos to the nvidia marketing as i wrote.

but sure not because the RTX cards are such great value.
the RTX 2060 be the best out of the bunch i agree with that.


90% i know who have a clue about GPU´s in the press had some critical words to say about the RTX release.



Quote:
They've without a doubt had a significant impact on increasing the penetration of DXR amongst both developers and consumers with every modern game engine now in the process of implementing realtime-raytracing
i could buy a tesla years ago.
unfortunately there was no supercharger to be seen here.
i did not want a car that i can only charge in my own garage.


did i buy a tesla and put it my garage without any real use for it.... no.

it made no sense to buy a tesla back then when there was no infrastructure to support electric cars.


today that changed. it is still not perfect but my tesla know makes way more sense.
and i even got a better model.

raytracing cards are a bit like that.

the people who bought into the hype sure paved the way for me to enjoy RTX next year.

but that does not change a thing about the cards being overpriced.
people may not care about that and i understand, i pay way too much for some stuff too.
but i am not searching for excuses. i know it´s kind of a rip off.Quote

03-07-2019, 10:43:15

grec
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gothmoth View Post
yeah kudos to the nvida marketing as i wrote.

but sure not because the cards are such great value.
the RTX 2060 be the best out of the bunch i agree with that.



90% i know who have a clue about GPU´s in the press had some critical words to say about the RTX release.
Most of those dissipated after launch I think once the cards started dropping in price. Lets not forget the GTX1660/Ti are also Turing cards that have been incredibly popular.


Quote:
i could buy a tesla years ago.
unfortunately there was no supercharger to be seen here.
raytracing is a bit like that.

the people who bought into the hype sure paved the way for me to enjoy RTX next year.

but that does not change a thing about the cards being overpriced.
You're describing literally every revolutionary(IE requiring infrastructure changes) piece of technology ever made, new tech is expensive, Turing cards were expensive to produce, on a per-mm^2 of silicon/raw materials basis Turing was actually better value than Pascal. People who paid a lot for a Tesla years ago didn't get bad value on their purchase, because there was nothing comparable for that money at the time.

You can't use future tech to say current tech is bad value(Nor can you use current tech that doesn't actually do the same things), because then literally all tech ever made is bad value because something in the future will be better. "Just wait", but how long for till it "makes sense"? Time is invaluable to some people, particularly tech enthusiasts, if everyone waited till things became mainstream, progressive tech would never actually become mainstream. Catch 22.Quote

03-07-2019, 10:52:44

Warchild
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gothmoth View Post

i could buy a tesla years ago.
unfortunately there was no supercharger to be seen here.
i did not want a car that i can only charge in my own garage.


did i buy a tesla and put it my garage without any real use for it.... no.

it made no sense to buy a tesla back then when there was no infrastructure to support electric cars.



today that changed. it is still not perfect but my tesla know makes way more sense.
and i even got a better model.

raytracing cards are a bit like that.

the people who bought into the hype sure paved the way for me to enjoy RTX next year.

but that does not change a thing about the cards being overpriced.
Then clearly you have not looked outside your own country. Buying a tesla back when it was uncommon was a genius move. No tax, no toll prices, free parking, the list goes on. Governments had no idea how to treat them in that respect and so they paid for themselves in such a short time, as well as held their value strongly.

Now, they are more expensive, yes but and Govs have found ways to tax them. As well as being popular enough that they lose value more than ever. So not the greatest example there... sorry.

New tech is new tech. its costly and wasn't mature. But there was an infrastructure here for sure.

I get your point, but the example just wasn't the greatest to use.Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.