G.Skill Trident X 2400MHz 8GB Review
AIDA64
Published: 29th June 2012 | Source: G.Skill | Price: |
AIDA64
Things are still as close in the AIDA64 Memory Benchmarks. The Trident X just takes the overall prize, but the Ripjaws X are breathing down their neck.
Memory latency is always measured in such a barely imaginable tiny amount of time that we've never felt it relates too heavily to performance. However, the Trident X 2400 MHz still is a whopping 3ns faster than anything else we've tested, despite being CAS10.
Most Recent Comments
Awesome review! Finally an 8GB Trident X Kit 
Quote
QuoteA good review once again, and I think this really hammers it home that anything more than 1600MHz is a waste, unless it's the same price as the 1600MHz DIMMs.
He says...with his overpriced 2133MHz RAM -.-Quote
He says...with his overpriced 2133MHz RAM -.-Quote
Idk if its just me but Id like to see some 1600mhz kit with tight timings rather than just high clocked with loose timings. I guess its possible to underclock and get lower latencies but perhaps companies could sell the 1600mhz at a cheaper price because big numbers = bigger price a lot of the time.Quote
Can anyone recommend a ram water block for these sticks? Thanks 
Quote
QuoteQuote:
|
Originally Posted by delusion77
Idk if its just me but Id like to see some 1600mhz kit with tight timings rather than just high clocked with loose timings. I guess its possible to underclock and get lower latencies but perhaps companies could sell the 1600mhz at a cheaper price because big numbers = bigger price a lot of the time.
|
Tight timings makes SFA difference to 1155, its all about the bandwidth aka - MHz when it comes to good performance with these.Quote
CSS Valid