Kingston HyperX DDR3 CL9 2000mhz 3GB Triple channel kit
3D Benchmarks
Published: 16th February 2009 | Source: Kingston Technology | Price: £214.99 |
3DMark is a popular synthetic gaming benchmark used by many gamers and overclockers to gauge the performance of their PC's. All 3DMark runs were performed a total of 5 times, with the highest and lowest results being removed and an average calculated from the remaining 3 results.
Ubisoft has developed a new engine specifically for Far Cry 2, called Dunia, meaning "world", "earth" or "living" in Parsi. The engine takes advantage of multi-core processors as well as multiple processors and supports DirectX 9 as well as DirectX 10. Running the Far Cry 2 benchmark tool the test was run 5 times with the highest and lowest scores being omitted and the average calculated from the remaining 3.
Again the faster Kingston took the advantage and beat the Corsair throughout the tests. Despite the Corsair having lower timings, the higher bandwidth of the Kingston HyperX showed it is not worth the 6GB if it means sacrificing speed.
Let's head over to the conclusion...
Most Recent Comments
Linky to the forum is broken!
Also nice review, but preferred to see a 6GB at 1800, 3GB doesn't cut it, especially at those pricesQuote
Also nice review, but preferred to see a 6GB at 1800, 3GB doesn't cut it, especially at those pricesQuote
i really love the Red heat spreaders on my G Skill i think they are tastefully done but they still look good but good point on changing color on the PCB... anyways that price is likely more then we mid-rangers can afford... but for performance good show...Quote
Holy heck. That RAM flies. Didn't think that such a small (relative) difference between the two kits could have such a big effect in the graphs.
It's a steep price to pay, but i7 isn't a cheap thing to adopt anyway and if we pay 300 notes for our graphics, then why not speed up the whole system for less?Quote
It's a steep price to pay, but i7 isn't a cheap thing to adopt anyway and if we pay 300 notes for our graphics, then why not speed up the whole system for less?Quote
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='VonBlade'
Holy heck. That RAM flies. Didn't think that such a small (relative) difference between the two kits could have such a big effect in the graphs.
It's a steep price to pay, but i7 isn't a cheap thing to adopt anyway and if we pay 300 notes for our graphics, then why not speed up the whole system for less? |
CSS Valid
But the price....Quote