Call of Duty: WWII PC Performance Review

AMD VS Nvidia - RX 480 VS GTX 1060 - Benchmarks from Low to Max Settings

Call of Duty: WWII PC Performance Review

AMD VS Nvidia - RX 480 VS GTX 1060 - Benchmarks from Low to Max Settings

When comparing our RX 480 and GTX 1060 Strix GPUs we can see that this game offers fairly similar performance on both graphics processors, though Nvidia does have a small advantage here. 

The only time where Nvidia sees a large advantage is when the game is played at its lowest graphical settings, which are not setting that we recommend playing the game with unless you really want a higher framerate. 

The key thing here is that while Nvidia does have an advantage in terms of average framerate, the minimum framerate of AMD's RX 480 is almost identical to the GTX 1060 at almost all settings, giving both very similar gameplay experience. 

One thing that needs to be stated here is that our benchmarking sequence comes from a demanding area in the game's campaign, offering some of the lowest framerates that the game has to offer. Typically the game will run at higher framerates than this, though many of the game's in-engine cutscenes can actually perform worse, though this is not that big of an issue because players can barely interact with these scenes. 

 

Call of Duty: WWII PC Performance Review  

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next»

Most Recent Comments

07-11-2017, 11:29:22

AngryGoldfish
AMD used to be great with COD games. The last title saw Fury X easily beating 980Ti.

I'm not sure how I feel about this game. At times it gets me excited to reminisce and go back to my early days of PC video gaming by trying to complete the first Call of Duty on Veteran difficulty, but the same issues that were present 10-15 years ago are still present now. Call of Duty as a franchise has aged poorly in my opinion. While it performs well, the graphics don't look very impressive to me. The story seems overly macho. It just feels so phoned in and fake.Quote

07-11-2017, 12:35:36

AlienALX
Going to get this but not yet. My gaming partner and I played through BLOPS III in co op, and even though the story made no sense and it was terrible it was still lots of fun because of the co op. I have just bought us Infinite Warfare and when we are done with that we are getting this also.

Props to AV for keeping Co Op a part of their games. Very important, IMO.Quote

07-11-2017, 19:28:36

Decan
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienALX View Post
Going to get this but not yet. My gaming partner and I played through BLOPS III in co op, and even though the story made no sense and it was terrible it was still lots of fun because of the co op. I have just bought us Infinite Warfare and when we are done with that we are getting this also.

Props to AV for keeping Co Op a part of their games. Very important, IMO.
Note that the Single player doesn't support co-op. only the zombie mode does.Quote

08-11-2017, 05:21:27

AlienALX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decan View Post
Note that the Single player doesn't support co-op. only the zombie mode does.
In IW? oh bugger. Ah well. Or do you mean WW2?Quote

08-11-2017, 06:42:29

WYP
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienALX View Post
In IW? oh bugger. Ah well. Or do you mean WW2?
He means WWII, the campaign is single-player only, though online co-op is still available in Zombies mode (not sure if it has split-screen on PC...).Quote
Reply
x

Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.