Kingston DataTraveler HyperX Predator 512GB Review


Kingston DataTraveler HyperX Predator 512GB Review


Usually when writing our conclusions we have an array of things we can compare something to. We take into account build-quality, performance, pricing and what the possible alternatives are that you could buy. After all, times are hard, money is tight, and when you're creating a shopping list for a particular task if you can have two things that perform identically but one is half the price of the other, it affects how you look at them.

With the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX Predator, there is nothing at all to compare it to. Certainly it's a USB stick, and so one would assume that those are an easy comparison. But when we see how blisteringly fast the DT HyperX is, any other USB stick is so slow that it would be akin to comparing a Blackpool Donkey to Secretariat. Also your average thumb drive is usually found wallowing in the 16GB end of the market, rather than the titanic 512GB of the Kingston. Even most SSDs are around 256GB rather than 512GB. However, the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX Predator is not as fast as a SATA 6GBs SSD drive and nor would we expect it to be, thanks to the limits of the USB 3.0 format.

So it's in a class of one.

Firstly you have the speed of a mid-range SSD drive. In our testing it regularly hit the manufacturers claimed speeds, and sometimes passed them. If you felt that your USB 3.0 thumb drive was fast, the Kingston makes it look like going from an Optical drive to a SATA3 SSD. We could transfer a 1.2GB video file to it in 11.2 seconds, and from the Kingston DT HyperX to another drive in 4.4 seconds. To put that in perspective it took 38.7 seconds to write and 35.3 seconds to read it off of our Lexar Jump Drive.

Secondly is the sheer capacity. 512GB is a lot, which sounds obvious but in comparison to the limits usually applied it frees you up to do all sorts of cool things with it. Finally, the portability. Because it is still a USB stick, albeit the Rolls Royce of USB sticks, you can put it in any pocket at all. Even the silly money pocket you get on jeans, or the space for a pocket watch in your three-piece suit. The build quality is exceptional. The casing is extremely robust and it would take some serious deliberate effort to damage it at all, much less render it broken.

It is a teensy bit pricey though. Actually by any measure at all, it's expensive. You could buy a 512GB Samsung 840 Pro for about £380, which makes the £640 price-tag on the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX Predator as big as its name. Compared to an SSD it's expensive and slow. Compared to a USB stick it's blisteringly quick and tolerably priced. Big leaps in technology always come with an early-adopter price-tag, and the DT HyperX falls into that category.

But that is all somewhat missing the point. You're not buying this because of how it compares to other items. You're buying it because you have a very specific set of demands and this is the only product on the market that combines the capacity, speed, and portability. It works on anything you can plug a USB stick into which cannot be said (in console and television terms) of anything similar fast/large device. You could fit four people and some shopping into both a Ford Focus and a Bentley. You can play Chopsticks on both a Casio and a Steinway.

If money were no object we'd give it a Gold without a beat. It's fast, easily portable and large it's nearly perfect for putting your Steam collection onto and taking your whole game collection with you wherever you go. We know that only a very select band of people need what the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX Predator has to offer, but if you do, nothing else comes close. For that reason we're going to award it our OC3D Performance Award.


Thanks to Kingston for supplying the DataTraveler HyperX Predator for review. Discuss it in the OC3D Forums.

«Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next»

Most Recent Comments

01-07-2013, 06:18:41

Today we're taking a look at the Kingston DT HyperX, a pen drive that rewrites the rules of what is possible.

Continue ReadingQuote

01-07-2013, 08:31:17

I want one just so that when people ask if you have a USB stick they can borrow, you can respond with 'sure, be careful though, it cost £640'. At which point I wouldn't actually give them it.Quote

01-07-2013, 09:18:54

OMG, lol.... that price

Why would anyone spend that much on a USB stick... ever?Quote

01-07-2013, 09:35:58

That price is absurd, you can get 2 512GB Crucial M4s with SATA to USB3 adapters for that money with a £50+ to spare. Yes, it's smaller, but it's also easier to break/lose and also slowerQuote

01-07-2013, 10:29:36

I would say that is in a class of if you need this tool you can get it now. Yes it is way too expensive for anything I would use it for. I would go with something like this with an SSD in it if I need a fast, portable, and rugged drive.Quote

01-07-2013, 12:13:14

The Orange One
It's pretty amazing how they can pack all that storage onto a small USB drive thoughQuote

01-07-2013, 12:40:49

Does it come with sound alarm ? I mean in case I get separated a great distance from it? would be useful.Quote

01-07-2013, 13:13:55

nice and all that, but at that price I'd be scared to take it out with me, which defeats the object of having it really.Quote

01-07-2013, 15:10:05

What? A 512Gb Pen Drive? Biggest I'd seen or heard was 64Gb, I'm way behind on the times it seems. Quote

01-07-2013, 23:19:59

Early tech adoption premiums... so high lol. Once the price comes down on this sort of flash drive performance I would LOVE one of these. 'till then I'll let the uber tech-heads blow their cash wads on it x-)Quote

04-07-2013, 21:37:41

I'm sorry but comparison with ssds is just useless, there is however a usb drive that can be used to compare(SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0), it's 64Gb, but it's only 80 dollars on amazon as of now, I've gotten mine up to 210mb/s,190mb/s read/write. Can you please do a comparison with the Kingston and Sandisk drives, since I can't afford the 1000 dollar Kingston drive Quote

05-07-2013, 04:46:35

Originally Posted by kittysniper View Post
I'm sorry but comparison with ssds is just useless, there is however a usb drive that can be used to compare(SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0), it's 64Gb, but it's only 80 dollars on amazon as of now, I've gotten mine up to 210mb/s,190mb/s read/write. Can you please do a comparison with the Kingston and Sandisk drives, since I can't afford the 1000 dollar Kingston drive

Sadly no mate. We reviewed the item with stuff we had to compare it with. This wasnt a round up and companies wont just send stuff in because we want it. Life is a little more complicated than that, we only did this because its nuts, we dont have time to go reviewing every USB3 stick on the market.

We are a bit too busy to be doing that Quote

05-07-2013, 07:43:31

Thx for the great review, but i can't fully agree with the performance score.
A msata ssd in a usb3 enclose is only a bit larger, but much faster and cheaper(about £200 cheaper). Its a pretty good thumb drive. But when there are other options that perform much better, scoring this thing a 9 for performance isn't really justified.Quote

05-07-2013, 14:16:07

Originally Posted by tinytomlogan View Post

We are a bit too busy to be doing that
In other words, AIN'T NOBODY GOT TIME FUH DAT!!!


Register for the OC3D Newsletter

Subscribing to the OC3D newsletter will keep you up-to-date on the latest technology reviews, competitions and goings-on at Overclock3D. We won't share your email address with ANYONE, and we will only email you with updates on site news, reviews, and competitions and you can unsubscribe easily at any time.

Simply enter your name and email address into the box below and be sure to click on the links in the confirmation emails that will arrive in your e-mail shortly after to complete the registration.

If you run into any problems, just drop us a message on the forums.